Seems a notable omission to leave out the relationship with Liu He ❓- did he not impact your/US thinking on China from 2008 to last year❓Wondered also about internal US dynamics; people like Kent Campbell; Chas Freeman & other usual suspects - e.g, difficulties in managing political level; esp domestic interests which make long term policy engagement a major challenge; extent to which win/lose, zero sum policy approach; then pivot to Asia to reinforce escalation dominance strategy of America Inc (Linda Weiss) that saw containment & decoupling policy plus ubiquitous sanctions on more than 1000 Chinese firms a reasonable response to rise of Chinese competition as part of overall strength of Asia❓
An interesting and timely release. Susan Shirk is spot on that Xi’s grip is less secure than many imagine despite the massive surveillance and terror machinery. Discontent can erode stealthily. Authoritarian regimes are seemingly stable until … they aren’t. And it can be sudden. A bit like the party game with wood blocks. Someone eventually pulls out a block that beings the whole pile down. And in China that could be something seemingly trivial that escalates in ways that unloosens various bits of Xi’s edifice of control. It’s probably some such fear that fuels his remotely obsession with security and repression of any dissent.
Seems a notable omission to leave out the relationship with Liu He ❓- did he not impact your/US thinking on China from 2008 to last year❓Wondered also about internal US dynamics; people like Kent Campbell; Chas Freeman & other usual suspects - e.g, difficulties in managing political level; esp domestic interests which make long term policy engagement a major challenge; extent to which win/lose, zero sum policy approach; then pivot to Asia to reinforce escalation dominance strategy of America Inc (Linda Weiss) that saw containment & decoupling policy plus ubiquitous sanctions on more than 1000 Chinese firms a reasonable response to rise of Chinese competition as part of overall strength of Asia❓
C Wilson, Ottawa
An interesting and timely release. Susan Shirk is spot on that Xi’s grip is less secure than many imagine despite the massive surveillance and terror machinery. Discontent can erode stealthily. Authoritarian regimes are seemingly stable until … they aren’t. And it can be sudden. A bit like the party game with wood blocks. Someone eventually pulls out a block that beings the whole pile down. And in China that could be something seemingly trivial that escalates in ways that unloosens various bits of Xi’s edifice of control. It’s probably some such fear that fuels his remotely obsession with security and repression of any dissent.